Call for Consultants

ATC is committed to building a workforce that is as diverse as the communities we serve. Are you interested in consulting? Join us!

Celebrating the Past, Engaging the Present, and Envisioning the Future
December 8, 2023   |   San Francisco
Click here to learn more!

 

PROJECT OVERVIEW

Title: Identification and Mitigation of Nonductile Concrete Buildings

Project Status: Completed

Client: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)

PROJECT SUMMARY

This project seeks to provide more robust information about the specific characteristics of older nonductile concrete buildings by identifying certain subclasses with inherent structural deficiencies suspected to be the most significant, and that can be more readily identified, and that represent a more consistent level of risk.  Identification of the most vulnerable features of these subclasses will allow prioritization of research and more rapid implementation of current and emerging performance-based seismic design technologies for mitigation of hazardous nonductile concrete buildings.

Work on this project is a continuation of efforts undertaken on the FEMA-funded ATC 78 Project, under which ATC prepared the interim 50% complete draft report, Identification and Mitigation of Non-Ductile Concrete Buildings.

Task 1: Continue Pilot Study for Evaluation of Method for Selection of Collapse Indicators.

This task involves reviewing and advancing work performed in the ATC 78 Project (the first phase of this project) to develop a method of identifying, characterizing, and ranking the significance of deficient characteristics of older nonductile concrete buildings. The work-product of this task is intended to serve as a pilot study for evaluation of a methodology to select configurational and/or structural characteristics that are significant collapse indicators in older concrete buildings.  An outline for this pilot study is described as part of Task 1.4 in the NIST/ATC 76-5 Program Plan, but progress in the first phase will focus additional studies in more detail than the original outline.

Subtask 1.1 – Review Concrete Building Subclass Information from Related Projects and Define Basic Nonductile Concrete Building Prototypes.

This task requires coordination with ongoing research in this area, including: (1) studies undertaken as part of the NSF/NEES Grand Challenge research project; (2) efforts of the Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI) Concrete Coalition; (3) the NIST/BSSC study to identify concrete building subtypes; and (4) efforts undertaken to implement the NIST/ATC 76-5 Program Plan.  Work in Phase 1 (ATC-78 Project) concluded that a major issue pertaining to determination of the importance of collapse indicators is development of methods to combine the effects of multiple collapse indicators in one building.  It was recommended to study whether initial separation of buildings into structural types would simplify the need to consider all combinations of all collapse indicators.  It was also suggested to study sequencing of inclusion of collapse indicators in such a way that all combinations were not necessary.

Subtask 1.2 – Conduct Problem-Focused Analytical Studies to improve and refine the methodology proposed to identify and prioritize collapse indicators.

Three major issues were identified in Phase 1 that need resolution:

  • It is well known that many collapses of concrete buildings initiate in the gravity load carrying system.  The various seismic weaknesses in such systems must be incorporated into the overall methodology.  Stiffness and/or strength of such systems can be easily included in model studies, but P-delta effects cannot be included without creating another variable that will affect the significance of each collapse indicator.  The methodology must be generalized, either within the evaluation procedure or for study of collapse indicators.
  •  Many, if not most, older concrete buildings contain walls that will affect response—either significant shear walls, or incidental walls such as fire stops or perimeter closer walls.  Concrete wall structures have been studied in previous projects associated with FEMA P695, Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors, but definition of collapse in such buildings is poorly identified.  Walls in combination with frames have not been studied.  A complete collapse indicator methodology must include walls.
  • Models used in Phase 1 of this project were adequate to measure flexural response, or adequate to measure shear/compression failure, but not both.  The crossover effect on prioritizing collapse indicators must be studied and incorporated into the methodology.

Subtask 1.3 – Incorporate the results of Subtasks 1.1 and 1.2 into advancing Building Evaluation Rules or other evaluation methodology to identify buildings with high probability of collapse.

This task utilizes the trends from focused analytical studies to assist in developing an enhanced screening procedure that could be used to progressively prioritize (screen) an inventory of older nonductile concrete buildings.  As currently envisioned, this procedure would involve more detail and effort (with greater reliability) than the FEMA 154 procedure for rapid visual screening of buildings (FEMA 2002), but less effort than the ASCE 31 procedure for seismic evaluation of existing buildings (ASCE 2003). 

Task 2: Preparation of a Report Documenting Analytical Studies of Subtask 1.1 and the Draft Building Evaluation Procedures developed in Subtasks 1.2 and 1.3.

Work will include preparationand publication of a final technical report (April 2013)

Print

 

 Welcome to the ATC Team!

Valley Mike crop As a former Principal at Magnusson Klemencic Associates in Seattle, Mike comes to ATC with more than 30 years of structural engineering experience in new design, evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings, applied research, and codes and standards development. Mike’s design experience includes the landmark Salesforce Tower in San Francisco, and his research and development experience includes the FEMA 356 Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, FEMA P-2012 Assessing Seismic Performance of Buildings with Configuration Irregularities (ATC-123 Project), and NIST GCR 10-917-9 Applicability of Nonlinear Multiple-Degree-of-Freedom Modeling for Design (ATC-76-6 Project).

Mike also has extensive experience as an ATC consultant serving as a reviewer, a technical contributor, and Project Director on multiple ATC projects. We look forward to how Mike’s unique experiences as a successful team member will contribute to ATC projects in the future.
Mahoney Mike crop

Retired from federal service as a Senior Geophysicist with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Mike comes to ATC with more than 30 years of experience in hazard mitigation program management and policy development, post-disaster response and recovery, and problem-focused research and development in support of FEMA’s efforts under the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP). He has led FEMA’s earthquake-related work with the International Code Council and has been involved with the development of national model codes and standards since 1984.

In his career at FEMA, Mike has led the development of countless major FEMA publications, including: FEMA 350 Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings and its series of companion reports (ATC-41 Project series), FEMA P-58 Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings, Methodology and Implementation (ATC-58 Project series), FEMA P-695 Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors (ATC-63 Project), FEMA P-2018 Seismic Evaluation of Older Concrete Buildings for Collapse Potential (ATC-78 Project), and FEMA P-2090/NIST SP-1254 Recommended Options for Improving the Built Environment for Post-Earthquake Reoccupancy and Functional Recovery Time (ATC-137 Project). With Mike’s extensive knowledge of federal government programs, and past collaboration with state and local agencies, hazard mitigation partners, and code development organizations, we look forward to how his unique experiences will help serve ATC’s client needs and objectives in the future.