PROJECT OVERVIEW
Title:14th U.S.-Japan Workshop on the Improvement of Structural Design and Construction Practices
Project Status: This Workshop was conducted on December 3-5, 2012
Sponsors: Applied Technology Council (ATC) and Japan Structural Consultants Association (JSCA)
PROJECT SUMMARY
The Purpose of the Workshop is to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas and information relating to the improvement of current building design and construction practices in the United States and Japan. The special focus of this Workshop will be on issues relating to the performance of buildings and other structures in severe earthquakes, including the effects of tsunami, and response and recovery.
The Workshop is the 14th in a series started in 1984, and repeated every two-to-three years. Previous workshops have been held in California (San Diego and San Francisco), Hawaii (Honolulu, Kauai, Kona, Kohala Coast, and Maui), Japan (Kobe and Tokyo), and Victoria, British Columbia.
Workshop Participants. The Workshop Participants included those with a background in building performance and other structures in severe earthquakes, including the effects of tsunami, and response and recovery.
Workshop Program. The Workshop Program was designed for practicing structural engineers and researchers, and included technical presentations, and working group breakout sessions and discussions. Papers and presentations were as follows:
| Paper Number | Paper Title | Author | Presentation | Paper |
|
1. |
Brief Review of Building Damage by the 2011 Tohoku Japan Earthquake and Following Coping Activities | Isao Nishiyama*, Izuru Okawa, Hiroshi Fukuyama, and Yasuo Okuda |  |
 |
|
2. |
Structural Analysis Case Studies of Buildings Damaged During the Tohoku Tsunami | Lyle Carden*, G. Chock, I. Robertson, and G. Yu | |
|
|
3. |
Categorization of Damage to Buildings Caused by the March 2011 Tsunami | Hiroshi Fukuyama*, Y. Okuda, H. Kato, T. Ishihara, S. Tajiri, T. Kabeyasawa, and M. Tani | |
|
|
4. |
Current Tsunami Design Guidance in the United States – FEMA P-646 (2012) | Ian N. Robertson* | |
|
|
5. |
Structural Design Requirement on the Tsunami Evacuation Buildings | Hiroshi Fukuyama*, Y. Okuda, H. Kato, T. Ishihara, S. Tajiri, T. Kabeyasawa, and Y. Nakano | |
|
|
6. |
ASCE 7 and the Development of a Tsunami Building Code for the U.S. | Gary Chock * | |
|
|
7. |
Performance of Base-Isolated Buildings During the 2011 East Japan Earthquake | Yoshikazu Fukusawa* | |
|
|
8. |
Drift Issues of Tall Buildings under the March 11, 2011 M9.0 Tohoku Earthquake, Japan - Implications | Mehmet Celebi* | |
|
|
9. |
Performance of Seismically Isolated Buildings due to 2011 Tohoku Earthquake | Mineo Takayama* | |
|
|
10. |
Countermeasures for Long-Period Ground Motion | Takaharu Fukuda*, N. Koshika, and H. Kitamura | |
|
|
11. |
Dynamic Instability in High-Rise Steel Structures Subjected to Strong Ground Motions: A Review | Kohji Ikago* | |
|
|
12. |
Simulated Earthquake Ground Motion for Structural Design | Satoru Nagase* | |
|
|
13. |
The 2010-2011 Canterbury New Zealand Earthquakes and the Emergency Management of Buildings and Infrastructure | Peter R. Wood*, D. Brunsdon, J. Hare, M. Stannard, and B. Galloway | |
|
|
14. |
The Effectiveness of Post-Earthquake Building Safety Evaluations Carried out in the Canterbury Earthquake Sequence and Proposals for Future Development | Bruce Galloway*, D. Brunsdon, J. Hare, M. Stannard, and P. Wood | |
|
|
15. |
Lessons from the Postearthquake Safety Evaluation in the 2010-2011 Christchurch, New Zealand Earthquakes and Implications for Updating ATC-20 | Bret Lizundia* and R. Gallagher | |
|
|
16. |
Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Old Buildings Located Along the Specific Emergency Transportation Roads in Tokyo | Toshio Okoshi* | |
|
|
17. |
Recovery Cooperation for Padang Earthquake Damage by Seismic Isolation Buildings Design | Takayuki Teramoto* | |
|
|
18. |
Some Examples of Plan and Activity in Re-Construction from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake |
Mitsuru Kawamura* | |
|
|
19. |
Building Seismically Resilient Communities by Effective Seismic Risk Reduction and Disaster Reconstruction Programs | H. Kit Miyamoto* and Amir S.J. Gilani | |
|
|
20. |
Special Presentation: 52-Year Application of Seismic Provisions to Major Research Facilities | Roland Sharpe* | |
|
|
21. |
Transparent Global Earthquake Risk and Loss Estimation | Nicole Keller* and H. K. Miyamoto | |
|
|
22. |
Performance of Buildings under the Coming Mid-size Earthquake Beneath Tokyo Metropolitan Area | Yozo Shinozaki* | |
|
|
23. |
Risk Management and Loss Estimation Lessons from the Real World | Peter Yanev* and A. Yanev | |
|
|
24. |
San Francisco’s Community Action Plan for Seismic Safety | Christopher Rojahn*, L. Kornfield, L. Tobin, and L. Samant | |
|
|
25. |
Seismic Actions of Nonstructural Components | Hiroshi Ito* | |
|
|
26. |
The Horizon for Next-Generation Performance Assessment of Buildings is Here: FEMA P-58 | Jon A. Heintz* | |
|
|
27. |
Use of Performance Based Engineering Criteria in Motivating Residential Seismic Retrofit | Kelly Cobeen | |
|
|
28. |
Seismic Dampers: How High Performance Devices Change the World | H. Kit Miyamoto and A. M. Gilani | |
|
|
29. |
Performance Evaluation of a Building Structure with Nonlinear Dampers under Strong Ground Motion on March 11, 2011 | Isao Nishimura* | |
|
|
30. |
Seismic Retrofit of Ductile Concrete Moment-Resisting Frames With Innovative Pin-Supported Wall System | Hiroyasu Sakata, Z. Qu, S. Midorikawa, and A. Wada | |
|
|
31. |
Seismic Retrofit of the Tower Structure with Viscous Dampers | Nobuyuki Kurauchi* | |
|
|
32. |
Mission, Goals and Social Responsibility of Structural Engineers | Akira Wada* | |
|
*Presenting Author