Call for Consultants

ATC is committed to building a workforce that is as diverse as the communities we serve. Are you interested in consulting? Join us!

 

ATC Project No. Project Title Funding Agency
ATC-66 Series National Earthquake Technical Assistance Program (NETAP) Federal Emergency Management Agency
ATC-110
(CEA 2)
Development of a Prestandard for the Evaluation and Retrofit of One- and Two-Family Light Frame Residential Buildings California Earthquake Authority, Federal Emergency Management Agency
ATC-128-1 AISC-ATC Workshop on Performance-Based Structural-Fire Engineering American Institute of Steel Construction; ATC Endowment Fund
ATC-134 Series Performance-Based Seismic Engineering: Benchmarking of Existing Building Evaluation Methodologies National Institute of Standards and Technology
ATC-136 Series Technical Monitoring of New and Existing Seismic Building Codes and Related Training Federal Emergency Management Agency
ATC-137 Series Technical Training and Product Development Federal Emergency Management Agency
ATC-138 Series Support of Performance-Based Seismic Design of Buildings Federal Emergency Management Agency
ATC-140 Series Update of Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings Guidance Federal Emergency Management Agency
ATC-145 Series Guide for Repair of Earthquake Damaged Buildings to Achieve Future Resilience Federal Emergency Management Agency
ATC-149 Coastal Inundation Events in Developed Regions University of Notre Dame; National Institute of Standards and Technology


ATC-150 Improving the Nation’s Lifelines Infrastructure to Achieve Seismic Resilience Federal Emergency Management Agency
ATC-151 Seismic Safety Consulting Services for City of San Francisco City and County of San Francisco

ATC-152 Developing a Framework for Design of Lifeline Infrastructure Systems for Functional National Institute of Standards and Technology
ATC-153 Research Plan for the Study of Pre-Northridge Earthquake Weak Panel Zones in Welded Column Splices with PJP Groove Welds National Institute of Standards and Technology
ATC-154 Improving Seismic Design of New Buildings Federal Emergency Management Agency
ATC-155 Development of an Updated Plan to Coordinate NEHRP Post-Earthquake Investigations, Phase II U.S. Geological Survey usgs
ATC-156 Workshop for Seismic Practice Needs for Buildings and Lifeline Infrastructure Located in the Central and Eastern United States National Institute of Standards and Technology
ATC-157 Engineering Services in Support of Utah Division of Emergency Management to Address URM Risk in Public Schools Utah Department of Emergency Management (DEM) Utah DEM logo
STARR II JV Strategic Alliance for Risk Reduction (STARR) II Joint Venture, Production and Technical Services (PTS) for Architect and Engineering Services Nationwide Contract Federal Emergency Management Agency
ATC-SME Support for FEMA Earthquake Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) – Seismic Technical Guidance Development and Support Federal Emergency Management Agency
ATC-DGs Development of ATC Design Guides ATC Endowment Fund
ATC Hazards by Location ATC Hazards by Location Website for Geographic-Based Design Parameters ATC Endowment Fund

Print

 

Project Title:  National Earthquake Technical Assistance Program (NETAP) 

ClientFederal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)

Purpose: The purpose of the ATC-66 Series is to deliver trainings to the public that increase local earthquake knowledge and support the effective implementation of earthquake risk reduction activities. The National Earthquake Technical Assistance Program (NETAP) provides training delivery to support the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program. Courses relate to a wide range of subjects, including schools, hospitals, residences, rapid visual screening, post-earthquake assessment, building codes, and nonstructural components. Each year, the ATC-66 Project hosts around 40 trainings and trains about 2,500 participants. These trainings, which take place in-person or virtually, are provided in about 20 U.S. states and territories.

Resources: For a list of 2023 NETAP Upcoming Training Courses, Useful Information, and Related Resources, please click here.

Print

PROJECT OVERVIEW

Title:14th U.S.-Japan Workshop on the Improvement of Structural Design and Construction Practices

Project Status: This Workshop was conducted on December 3-5, 2012

Sponsors: Applied Technology Council (ATC) and Japan Structural Consultants Association (JSCA)

 

PROJECT SUMMARY

The Purpose of the Workshop is to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas and information relating to the improvement of current building design and construction practices in the United States and Japan. The special focus of this Workshop will be on issues relating to the performance of buildings and other structures in severe earthquakes, including the effects of tsunami, and response and recovery.

The Workshop is the 14th in a series started in 1984, and repeated every two-to-three years. Previous workshops have been held in California (San Diego and San Francisco), Hawaii (Honolulu, Kauai, Kona, Kohala Coast, and Maui), Japan (Kobe and Tokyo), and Victoria, British Columbia.

Workshop Participants.  The Workshop Participants included those with a background in building performance and other structures in severe earthquakes, including the effects of tsunami, and response and recovery.

Workshop Program.  The Workshop Program was designed for practicing structural engineers and researchers, and included technical presentations, and working group breakout sessions and discussions. Papers and presentations were as follows:

Paper Number Paper Title Author Presentation Paper

1.

Brief Review of Building Damage by the 2011 Tohoku Japan Earthquake and Following Coping Activities Isao Nishiyama*, Izuru Okawa, Hiroshi Fukuyama, and Yasuo Okuda

2.

Structural Analysis Case Studies of Buildings Damaged During the Tohoku Tsunami Lyle Carden*, G. Chock, I. Robertson, and G. Yu

3.

Categorization of Damage to Buildings Caused by the March 2011 Tsunami Hiroshi Fukuyama*, Y. Okuda, H. Kato, T. Ishihara, S. Tajiri, T. Kabeyasawa, and M. Tani

4.

Current Tsunami Design Guidance in the United States – FEMA P-646 (2012) Ian N. Robertson*

5.

Structural Design Requirement on the Tsunami Evacuation Buildings Hiroshi Fukuyama*, Y. Okuda, H. Kato, T. Ishihara, S. Tajiri, T. Kabeyasawa, and Y. Nakano

6.

ASCE 7 and the Development of a Tsunami Building Code for the U.S. Gary Chock *

7.

Performance of Base-Isolated Buildings During the 2011 East Japan Earthquake Yoshikazu Fukusawa*

8.

Drift Issues of Tall Buildings under the March 11, 2011 M9.0 Tohoku Earthquake, Japan - Implications Mehmet Celebi*

9.

Performance of Seismically Isolated Buildings due to 2011 Tohoku Earthquake Mineo Takayama*

10.

Countermeasures for Long-Period Ground Motion Takaharu Fukuda*, N. Koshika, and H. Kitamura

11.

Dynamic Instability in High-Rise Steel Structures Subjected to Strong Ground Motions: A Review Kohji Ikago*

12.

Simulated Earthquake Ground Motion for Structural Design Satoru Nagase*

13.

The 2010-2011 Canterbury New Zealand Earthquakes and the Emergency Management of Buildings and Infrastructure Peter R. Wood*, D. Brunsdon, J. Hare, M. Stannard, and B. Galloway

14.

The Effectiveness of Post-Earthquake Building Safety Evaluations Carried out in the Canterbury Earthquake Sequence and Proposals for Future Development Bruce Galloway*, D. Brunsdon, J. Hare, M. Stannard, and P. Wood

15.

Lessons from the Postearthquake Safety Evaluation in the 2010-2011 Christchurch, New Zealand Earthquakes and Implications for Updating ATC-20 Bret Lizundia* and R. Gallagher

16.

Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Old Buildings Located Along the Specific Emergency Transportation Roads in Tokyo Toshio Okoshi*

17.

Recovery Cooperation for Padang Earthquake Damage by Seismic Isolation Buildings Design Takayuki Teramoto*

18.

Some Examples of Plan and Activity in Re-Construction from the 2011 Great East Japan
Earthquake
Mitsuru Kawamura*

19.

Building Seismically Resilient Communities by Effective Seismic Risk Reduction and Disaster Reconstruction Programs H. Kit Miyamoto* and Amir S.J. Gilani

20.

Special Presentation:  52-Year Application of Seismic Provisions to Major Research Facilities Roland Sharpe*  

21.

Transparent Global Earthquake Risk and Loss Estimation Nicole Keller* and H. K. Miyamoto

22.

Performance of Buildings under the Coming Mid-size Earthquake Beneath Tokyo Metropolitan Area Yozo Shinozaki*

23.

Risk Management and Loss Estimation Lessons from the Real World Peter Yanev* and A. Yanev

24.

San Francisco’s Community Action Plan for Seismic Safety Christopher Rojahn*, L. Kornfield, L. Tobin, and L. Samant

25.

Seismic Actions of Nonstructural Components Hiroshi Ito*

26.

The Horizon for Next-Generation Performance Assessment of Buildings is Here:  FEMA P-58 Jon A. Heintz*

27.

Use of Performance Based Engineering Criteria in Motivating Residential Seismic Retrofit Kelly Cobeen

28.

Seismic Dampers:  How High Performance Devices Change the World H. Kit Miyamoto and A. M. Gilani

29.

Performance Evaluation of a Building Structure with Nonlinear Dampers under Strong Ground Motion on March 11, 2011 Isao Nishimura*

30.

Seismic Retrofit of Ductile Concrete Moment-Resisting Frames With Innovative Pin-Supported Wall System Hiroyasu Sakata, Z. Qu, S. Midorikawa, and A. Wada

31.

Seismic Retrofit of the Tower Structure with Viscous Dampers Nobuyuki Kurauchi*

32.

Mission, Goals and Social Responsibility of Structural Engineers Akira Wada*

*Presenting Author

Print

PROJECT OVERVIEW

Title: Community Action Plan for Seismic Safety (CAPSS) Project

Client: San Francisco Department of Building Inspection (DBI)

Status: Completed in 2010

Final Products: Available through the ATC office and for download at the link below.

Potential Earthquake Impacts (ATC-52-1 Report), which focuses on estimating impacts to the City’s privately owned buildings in future earthquakes; and the companion Technical Documentation volume (ATC-52-1A Report), which contains descriptions of the technical analyses that were conducted to produce the impact estimates;

A Community Action Plan for Seismic Safety (ATC-52-2 Report), which recommends policies to reduce earthquake risk in privately owned buildings of all types;

Earthquake Safety for Soft-Story Buildings (ATC-52-3 Report), which describes the risk of one vulnerable building type and recommends policies to reduce that risk, and the companion Documentation Appendices volume (ATC-52-3A Report), which details the technical methods and data used to develop the policy recommendations and related analyses; and

Post-earthquake Repair and Retrofit Requirements (ATC-52-4 Report), which recommends clarifications as to how owners should repair and strengthen their damaged buildings after an earthquake.

PROJECT SUMMARY

ATC-52-2 Project.  The Community Action Plan for Seismic Safety (CAPSS) project of the San Francisco Department of Building Inspection (DBI), carried out by ATC, was created to provide DBI and other City agencies and policymakers with a plan of action or policy road map to reduce earthquake risks in existing, privately-owned buildings that are regulated by the Department, and also to develop repair and rebuilding guidelines that will expedite recovery after an earthquake. Risk reduction activities will only be implemented and will only succeed if they make sense financially, culturally and politically, and are based on technically sound information. CAPSS engaged community leaders, earth scientists, social scientists, economists, tenants, building owners, and engineers to find out which mitigation approaches make sense in all of these ways and could, therefore, be good public policy.

Early phases of the CAPSS project, which commenced in 2000, involved planning and conducting an initial earthquake impacts study.  The final phase of work, which is described and documented in the report series, Here Today—Here Tomorrow: The Road to Earthquake Resilience in San Francisco, began in April of 2008 and was completed at the end of 2010.

Six CAPSS reports are available in the series, Here Today—Here Tomorrow: The Road to Earthquake Resilience in San Francisco:

  • Potential Earthquake Impacts (ATC-52-1 Report), which focuses on estimating impacts to the City’s privately owned buildings in future earthquakes; and the companion Technical Documentation volume (ATC-52-1A Report), which contains descriptions of the technical analyses that were conducted to produce the impact estimates;
  • A Community Action Plan for Seismic Safety (ATC-52-2 Report), which recommends policies to reduce earthquake risk in privately owned buildings of all types;
  • Earthquake Safety for Soft-Story Buildings (ATC-52-3 Report), which describes the risk of one vulnerable building type and recommends policies to reduce that risk, and the companion Documentation Appendices volume (ATC-52-3A Report), which details the technical methods and data used to develop the policy recommendations and related analyses; and
  • Post-earthquake Repair and Retrofit Requirements (ATC-52-4 Report), which recommends clarifications as to how owners should repair and strengthen their damaged buildings after an earthquake.

All six reports and other information about the CAPSS project are available here.

Print

PROJECT OVERVIEW

Title: Technical Assistance and Documentation of Case Studies, FEMA Guidelines for the Design of Structures for Vertical Evacuation From Tsunamis

Client: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)

Status: Completed in May 2012.

Participants: To see a list of project participants, click here.

Related Projects and Reports: The final product of the ATC-79/79-1 project is an updated version of the FEMA P-646 Report, Guidelines for the Design of Structures for Vertical Evacuation From Tsunamis (published in 2008, prepared for FEMA by ATC). 

PROJECT SUMMARY

This project involved the technical review and update of the FEMA P-646 Report,Guidelines for the Design of Structures for Vertical Evacuation From Tsunamis.  Following its publication in 2008, the document was used in conceptual design studies as part of tsunami evacuation planning in Cannon Beach, Oregon and the document’s design guidance was evaluated in ongoing research related to the development of Performance-Based Tsunami Engineering conducted at the University of Hawaii at Manoa, under the National Science Foundation-sponsored George E. Brown, Jr. Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (NEES) program.  Based on findings from these activities, FEMA initiated a follow-up project with ATC in 2009 to review the design guidance contained in FEMA P-646, and to consider updates, if needed, based on this new information.  As a result of this review, selected revisions were deemed necessary.  In March 2011, the devastating Tohoku tsunami struck Japan, providing a wealth of additional information that could be considered for inclusion in the update of the FEMA P-646 Report. 

The project was completed in May 2012, with the issuance of a Second Edition of the FEMA P-646 Report.  Technical updates contained in this Second Edition include: (1) observations and lessons learned from the March 11, 2011 Tohoku tsunami; (2) revision of the debris impact expression to remove over-conservatism deemed to be present in the prior edition; (3) additional explanation of the definition of tsunami elevation as it relates to run-up elevation used in tsunami force equations; and (4) an update of reference documents to the most current version.

The final product of this project is an updated FEMA P-646 Report, Guidelines for the Design of Structures for Vertical Evacuation From Tsunamis, Second Edition.  The FEMA P-646 report is available for free download here.

Print

 

 Welcome to the ATC Team!

Valley Mike crop As a former Principal at Magnusson Klemencic Associates in Seattle, Mike comes to ATC with more than 30 years of structural engineering experience in new design, evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings, applied research, and codes and standards development. Mike’s design experience includes the landmark Salesforce Tower in San Francisco, and his research and development experience includes the FEMA 356 Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, FEMA P-2012 Assessing Seismic Performance of Buildings with Configuration Irregularities (ATC-123 Project), and NIST GCR 10-917-9 Applicability of Nonlinear Multiple-Degree-of-Freedom Modeling for Design (ATC-76-6 Project).

Mike also has extensive experience as an ATC consultant serving as a reviewer, a technical contributor, and Project Director on multiple ATC projects. We look forward to how Mike’s unique experiences as a successful team member will contribute to ATC projects in the future.

Mahoney Mike crop

Retired from federal service as a Senior Geophysicist with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Mike comes to ATC with more than 30 years of experience in hazard mitigation program management and policy development, post-disaster response and recovery, and problem-focused research and development in support of FEMA’s efforts under the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP). He has led FEMA’s earthquake-related work with the International Code Council and has been involved with the development of national model codes and standards since 1984.

In his career at FEMA, Mike has led the development of countless major FEMA publications, including: FEMA 350 Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings and its series of companion reports (ATC-41 Project series), FEMA P-58 Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings, Methodology and Implementation (ATC-58 Project series), FEMA P-695 Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors (ATC-63 Project), FEMA P-2018 Seismic Evaluation of Older Concrete Buildings for Collapse Potential (ATC-78 Project), and FEMA P-2090/NIST SP-1254 Recommended Options for Improving the Built Environment for Post-Earthquake Reoccupancy and Functional Recovery Time (ATC-137 Project). With Mike’s extensive knowledge of federal government programs, and past collaboration with state and local agencies, hazard mitigation partners, and code development organizations, we look forward to how his unique experiences will help serve ATC’s client needs and objectives in the future.